CITATIONS
THE JURY
MENON
BURTE
SMITH
Venturing beyond the concerns of selecting the project for The Merit List, the Jury also frames issues and concerns that relate to practice and pedagogy of architecture in India. These discussion frames serve as essential readings and discourse for The Merit List and the profession in general.
REACTIONS FROM THE RECIPIENTS
- Khushru Irani Design Studio
Q. The TML observes a certain evaluation process to critically review projects and arrive at a ‘list’. As a finalist of The Merit List 2016-17 Cycle, what are your comments on the TML process? I liked that the jury for the 2nd Cycle was completely different from the first one, and yet had an exceptional breadth and quality to it. […] - mayaPRAXIS
Q. The TML observes a certain evaluation process to critically review projects and arrive at a ‘list’. As a finalist of The Merit List 2016-17 Cycle, what are your comments on the TML process? The process asks the architect community to present projects for the Merit List. And then has a small and eminent jury to look at the entries […] - Studio XS
Q. The TML observes a certain evaluation process to critically review projects and arrive at a ‘list’. As a finalist of The Merit List 2016-17 Cycle, what are your comments on the TML process? I am not completely aware of the process, but the break-up of these 2 sections from a shortlist and then to finalist is a good methodology, […] - Architecture Brio
Q. The TML observes a certain evaluation process to critically review projects and arrive at a ‘list’. As a finalist of The Merit List 2016-17 Cycle, what are your comments on the TML process? It is important for the jury to discuss and deliberate versus submitting individual assessments that are later added up and winners announced. There is definitely merit to the […]